Ads
-
Related paper
- INCIDENCE OF APICAL ROOT CRACK FORMATION AFTER ROTARY ROOT CANAL INSTRUMENTATION AT DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION LENGTHS USING PROTAPER UNIVERSAL, PROTAPER NEXT AND PROTAPER GOLD FILES - AN IN-VITRO STUDY
- Comparison of Root Canal Cleaning Ability of ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Rotary file systems - A Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) study
- Comparison of Centric Ability of Protaper Next, Wave One & Protaper using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
- Respect of the Canal Path: Comparative Study between WaveOne and Protaper Universal
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE AXIS MODIFICATION, CENTERING ABILITY AND APICAL DEBRIS EXTRUSION USING SINGLE-FILE RECIPROCATING AND CONTINUOUS ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS IN CURVED ROOT CANALS IN VITRO STUDY
- A comparative evaluation of two root canal instrumentation techniques for preparation of oval shaped root canals using cone beam computed tomography-an in vitro study
- Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Rotary Systems in the Removal of Debris in Apical Third of the Root Canal: An in Vitro Study
- The impact of different kinematics on crack formation in root dentin after endodontic instrumentation
- Push-out bond strength of root-fillings made with gutta-percha and AH Plus in oval canals instrumented with Self-Adjusting File (SAF), WaveOne and Protaper NEXT? A comparative ex vivo study
- Evaluation of canal preparation with rotary and hand Niti files in curved root canals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study